Do They Really Expect You To Believe This?

The 'No Kings' protests against President Trump are based on a misunderstanding of American governance, funded by partisan organizations, and fueled by selective media narratives rather than genuine tyranny.

• The 'No Kings' protests are misguided, as the U.S. has an electoral system and allows free protest, unlike a monarchy.

• 'No Kings' is an 'astroturf' movement, funded by partisan organizations like Soros' Open Societies Foundation.

• Both left and right-leaning media are criticized for spreading 'fake news' and exaggerating protest details, undermining factual discourse.

The 'No Kings' protests, purportedly against President Trump acting as a monarch, are criticized as baseless, given the American electoral system allows for voting and protesting elected officials. These demonstrations are labeled 'astroturf,' reportedly funded by organizations like Soros' Open Societies Foundation, and are seen as a form of peer pressure from the left. The media's portrayal of the protests is also scrutinized, with claims of exaggerating attendance numbers and misrepresenting the nature of the events.

Critiquing 'No Kings' Idea

• 00:00:32 The premise of the 'No Kings' protests is fundamentally flawed because the United States does not operate under a monarchy; the President is elected through primaries and general elections, and citizens are free to protest without fear of reprisal. Protesting an elected official, as seen with these demonstrations, directly contradicts the idea of living under a king, which typically involves no voting rights or freedom to dissent.

• 00:01:44 Media outlets and politicians are accused of spreading 'fake news' regarding the 'No Kings' protests, both by exaggerating their scale and misrepresenting their nature. While some on the right incorrectly claimed certain protest images were old, the left is criticized for inflating attendance numbers, with both sides allegedly pulling figures 'out of Dom Lemon's ass.' The hosts emphasize that the truth, even if less dramatic, is sufficient and that relying on lies discredits those who should be sources of accurate information.

• 00:11:39 The 'No Kings' protests are identified as an 'astroturf' movement, managed and organized by 'Indivisible,' an organization that allegedly received at least three million dollars from Soros' Open Societies Foundation, among other progressive groups. The funding sources are highlighted to suggest that the protests are not organic grassroots movements but rather orchestrated efforts to generate political pressure, often clocking out at specific times rather than engaging in sustained demonstrations.

• 00:19:04 President Trump's actions do not fit the definition of a 'king' in the American context, as he voluntarily left office after an election and has not systematically suppressed individual liberties in the way previous administrations are accused of doing. In contrast, instances cited under past Democratic administrations include targeting political opponents via the IRS, advocating for gun control, imposing vaccine mandates, and attempting to regulate parental decisions, which are presented as more significant infringements on personal freedom than anything attributed to Trump's 'kingly' behavior.